Electrocardiographic Predictors of Early Atrial Fibrillation After Transcatheter Atrial Septal Defect Closure: The Roles of P-Wave Dispersion and P-Terminal Force in V1
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
VOLUME: 7 ISSUE: 1
P: 171 - 177
January 2026

Electrocardiographic Predictors of Early Atrial Fibrillation After Transcatheter Atrial Septal Defect Closure: The Roles of P-Wave Dispersion and P-Terminal Force in V1

Forbes J Med 2026;7(1):171-177
1. Bakırçay University Çiğli Training and Research Hospital, Department of Cardiology, İzmir, Türkiye
2. University of Health Sciences Türkiye, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Clinic of Cardiology, İstanbul, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 18.04.2026
Accepted Date: 22.09.2026
Online Date: 14.10.2026
Publish Date: 14.10.2026
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

ABSTRACT

Objective

Early atrial fibrillation (AF) can complicate transcatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) closure, yet simple electrocardiographic predictors remain underused. We investigated whether baseline P-wave dispersion (PWDis) and P-terminal force in V1 (PTFV1) predicted AF within 48 hours post-procedure.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, two-center cohort study including 555 consecutive adults (18-85 years) who underwent successful percutaneous secundum ASD closure between March 2015 and September 2024. Patients with prior AF, coronary artery disease, failed procedures, emergent surgery, in-hospital death within 48 hours, suboptimal records, or unavailable preprocedural ECGs were excluded. Baseline 12-lead ECGs (25 mm/s, 10 mm/mV; 0.05-100 Hz) were digitized and measured at 4× magnification. PWDis was calculated as the difference between maximum and minimum P-wave duration across 12 leads; PTFV1 was defined as the product of the duration and amplitude of the terminal negative P-wave component in V1 (µV·ms).

Results

Of 555 patients, 27 (4.9%) developed AF within 48 hours. Patients with AF were older (59.6±13.1 vs. 37.9±14.7 years, p<0.001) and more often NYHA class II (p<0.001). On ECG, PWDis and PTFV1 were significantly higher in the AF group (PWDis 42.8±13.9 vs. 36.4±11.8 ms, p=0.007; PTFV1 4325.9±730.4 vs. 3876.5±656.1 µV·ms, p=0.001). Both PWDis [odds ratio (OR) 1.036; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.004-1.068; p=0.025] and PTFV1 (OR 1.086; 95% CI 1.027-1.149; p=0.004) independently predicted AF. ROC analysis identified PTFV1 >4,050 µV·ms and PWDis >36.5 ms as predictors of early AF.

Conclusion

Preprocedural PWDis and PTFV1 independently predict early AF after ASD device closure. These ubiquitous, low-cost ECG indices may help risk-stratify candidates and tailor peri-procedural monitoring and prophylaxis strategies.

Keywords:
Atrial septal defect, atrial fibrillation, P-wave dispersion, P-terminal force, noninvasive electrocardiology, transcatheter closure

INTRODUCTION

Adults with an unrepaired secundum atrial septal defect (ASD) are predisposed to atrial arrhythmias due to chronic right atrial (RA) volume overload, progressive atrial dilation, and electrical remodeling, all of which contribute to the development of an arrhythmogenic substrate over time.1-3 Although transcatheter ASD closure effectively eliminates the left-to-right shunt and reduces right-sided volume overload, early and late atrial tachyarrhythmias continue to occur following the procedure, particularly in older patients, those with delayed defect closure, and those with advanced atrial remodeling prior to the procedure.4-6 Previous studies have suggested that persistent electrophysiological abnormalities may remain despite successful anatomical correction, indicating that eliminating the hemodynamic burden does not necessarily reverse established atrial remodeling.7-9

Recent evidence has further expanded the concept of atrial remodeling to encompass the broader entity of atrial cardiomyopathy, which includes structural, electrical, contractile, and autonomic abnormalities that predispose patients to atrial fibrillation (AF), thromboembolic events, and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, even before clinically overt arrhythmia develops.10 Consequently, identifying simple, reproducible, and widely available markers that reflect the underlying atrial substrate has become an important clinical objective. Surface electrocardiography (ECG) is an inexpensive and universally accessible tool that provides valuable information on atrial conduction abnormalities without requiring advanced imaging techniques.11, 12

Among ECG-derived parameters, P-wave dispersion (PWDis)-defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum P-wave durations across the 12-lead ECG-reflects heterogeneous atrial conduction and has consistently been associated with paroxysmal AF, atrial conduction delay, and recurrent arrhythmias in various cardiovascular conditions.13-17 Likewise, P-terminal force in lead V1 (PTFV1), originally described by Morris and colleagues, quantifies the duration and amplitude of the terminal negative portion of the P wave in that lead and has emerged as a robust electrocardiographic marker of left atrial electrical and structural remodeling. A growing body of evidence has demonstrated significant associations between abnormal PTFV1 and incident AF, ischemic stroke, atrial cardiomyopathy, and cardiovascular mortality across diverse patient populations.18-21

Despite the growing body of evidence supporting ECG-derived atrial biomarkers, data regarding the predictive value of PWDis and PTFV1 specifically in patients undergoing transcatheter ASD closure remain limited. Because early post-procedural AF may prolong hospitalization, increase the risk of thromboembolism, and necessitate additional rhythm management, identifying patients at increased risk prior to the procedure may facilitate individualized peri-procedural monitoring and preventive strategies. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate whether baseline PWDis and PTFV1 independently predict early (≤48-hour) AF following successful percutaneous secundum ASD closure.

METHODS

Ethics committee approval for the study was obtained from the Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee of İzmir Bakırçay University (decision number: 2105; date: 7 March 2025). Written informed consent was not obtained because of retrospective design.

We conducted a retrospective cohort study at two tertiary centers. We included 555 consecutive adults (18-85 years) who underwent successful percutaneous secundum ASD closure between March 2015 and September 2024 at two cardiology clinics. Exclusion criteria were prior AF, any failed procedure, need for urgent cardiac surgery, known coronary artery disease, death within 48 hours of the procedure, suboptimal records, or unavailable preprocedural ECGs. Demographics, baseline 12-lead ECGs, transthoracic echocardiography, laboratory values, procedural details, and occluder device characteristics were extracted from hospital records. During hospitalization, all ECGs were acquired in the supine position at 25 mm/s and 10 mm/mV with 0.05-100 Hz filter settings, scanned and digitized, and analyzed at 4× magnification on a high-resolution monitor. All patients were continuously monitored with in-hospital telemetry during the first 24 hours following the procedure. During the subsequent 24 hours, patients were evaluated with standard 12-lead ECG recordings in the presence of symptoms or rhythm irregularities detected by bedside monitoring systems or wearable devices. AF was defined as an irregularly irregular rhythm without discernible P waves lasting ≥30 seconds on surface ECG. PWDis was calculated as the difference between the maximum and minimum P-wave durations across all 12 leads. PTFV1 was defined as the product of the duration and amplitude of the terminal negative P-wave component in lead V1 (µV·ms) (Figure 1). AF within the first 48 hours post-procedure was diagnosed by surface ECG or Holter monitoring. Patients without AF were classified as Group 1, and those with AF were classified as Group 2. ECG measurements were performed by two independent cardiologists who were blinded to clinical outcomes.

Statistical Analysis

Normality of continuous variables was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Continuous variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables as counts and percentages. Group comparisons were performed using Student’s t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Logistic regression identified independent ECG predictors of AF. Optimal cut-offs were derived by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

RESULTS

Of 555 patients, 175 (31.5%) were male and 380 (68.5%) female; mean age was 39.1±15.3 years (range 18-85). At baseline, 510 (91.9%) patients were NYHA class I and 45 (8.1%) were class II. All procedures were technically successful; however, 27 patients (4.9%) developed AF within 48 hours. Patients with AF were significantly older (59.6±13.1 vs. 37.9±14.7 years, p<0.001), and AF was more common in NYHA class II (p<0.001). During the study period, no patients with NYHA class III-IV were deemed suitable for transcatheter closure. Mean ASD diameter was 15.8±5.7 mm; mean occluder size 21.5±6.2 mm. Mean LVEF was 61.7±3.2%, mean sPAP 42.4±16.6 mmHg, and mean Qp/Qs 2.2±0.6. There were no between-group differences in echocardiographic or laboratory parameters (all p>0.05) (Tables 1 and 2). Mean heart rate was 70.8±9.2 bpm; mean PWDis 36.7±11.9 ms; mean PTFV1 3904±666 µV·ms. Compared with Group 1, Group 2 had greater PWDis (42.8±13.9 vs. 36.4±11.8 ms, p=0.007) and higher PTFV1 (4325.9±730.4 vs. 3876.5±656.1 µV·ms, p=0.001) (Table 1). In multivariable models, both PWDis [odds ratio (OR) 1.036; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.004-1.068; p=0.025] and PTFV1 (OR 1.086; 95% CI 1.027-1.149; p=0.004) independently predicted early AF (Table 3). ROC analysis yielded cut-offs for PTFV1 (>4,050 µV·ms; AUC 0.681; sensitivity 63%; specificity 62%) and for PWDis (>36.5 ms; AUC 0.634; sensitivity 57%; specificity 61%) (Figure 2). ROC analysis showed modest discriminatory performance.

DISCUSSION

In this two-center cohort of adults undergoing transcatheter secundum ASD closure, we demonstrated that two readily obtainable ECG-derived parameters, PWDis and PTFV1, independently predicted early AF within 48 hours after the procedure. Although the incidence of early AF was relatively low, patients who developed AF exhibited significantly more pronounced abnormalities in both ECG markers measured before intervention, suggesting that pre-existing atrial electrical remodeling, rather than the procedure itself, is the principal determinant of early arrhythmogenesis. These findings support the growing concept that conventional surface ECG may provide clinically meaningful information regarding atrial substrate before structural heart interventions.

The biological plausibility of our findings is supported by the well-established pathophysiology of ASD. Chronic left-to-right shunting exposes the right atrium to prolonged volume overload, resulting in atrial dilatation, myocyte stretch, neurohormonal activation, inflammation, and progressive fibrosis. These changes alter conduction velocity and increase conduction heterogeneity, facilitating re-entry and AF. Importantly, several experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated that electrical remodeling may persist despite successful defect closure, particularly in adults undergoing late intervention.22-26 Consequently, elimination of the hemodynamic burden does not necessarily normalize the pre-existing arrhythmogenic substrate.

PWDis reflects heterogeneous atrial conduction and has consistently been associated with AF in several cardiovascular disorders.27-31 Increased dispersion indicates delayed and non-uniform atrial activation, thereby facilitating wavefront fragmentation and re-entry. Our results extend previous observations by demonstrating that PWDis remains clinically relevant in patients undergoing transcatheter ASD closure, indicating that atrial conduction abnormalities persist despite correction of the underlying congenital lesion.

PTFV1 has emerged as one of the most robust ECG markers of atrial cardiomyopathy. Unlike simple P-wave duration, PTFV1 reflects both delayed atrial activation and increased left atrial electrical load, and correlates with atrial fibrosis, AF, stroke, and cardiovascular outcomes.32-35 Although ASD primarily affects the right heart, long-standing interatrial interactions and biatrial remodeling may explain why an index reflecting left atrial abnormalities independently predicted early AF in our cohort. These findings further support the concept that atrial electrical remodeling in ASD represents a biatrial, rather than an exclusively RA, process.

The incidence of early AF in our cohort (4.9%) is comparable to that reported in previous studies evaluating transcatheter ASD closure, in which post-procedural AF rates have generally ranged between approximately 2% and 7%, depending on patient age, timing of rhythm assessment, and duration of follow-up. Older age has consistently emerged as one of the strongest determinants of post-closure atrial arrhythmias, supporting the concept that the burden of pre-existing atrial remodeling, rather than the procedure itself, primarily drives arrhythmia occurrence.4, 5, 22, 23 The present findings extend these observations by demonstrating that ECG-derived markers of atrial electrical remodeling provide additional prognostic information beyond age alone.

The modest ROC performance observed in our analysis should not diminish the clinical value of these markers. AF is a multifactorial disease, and excellent discrimination based on a single ECG variable is not expected. Instead, PWDis and PTFV1 should be regarded as complementary biomarkers that may improve prediction when integrated with age, atrial dimensions, clinical variables and procedural characteristics.

Another noteworthy finding of the present study is that neither echocardiographic parameters nor routine laboratory parameters differed significantly between patients who developed early AF and those who remained in sinus rhythm, whereas both ECG-derived indices retained independent predictive value. This observation suggests that subtle electrical remodeling may precede overt structural abnormalities detectable by conventional imaging. Similar findings have been reported in previous studies, which demonstrate that electrocardiographic markers often identify atrial vulnerability before measurable changes in atrial size or function become evident.10, 18, 20 Accordingly, PWDis and PTFV1 should not be regarded merely as surrogate ECG measurements, but rather as noninvasive indicators of the underlying atrial substrate. This concept is particularly relevant in adults with ASD, in whom chronic atrial remodeling develops gradually over many years and may persist despite successful defect closure. Therefore, the incorporation of ECG-derived atrial biomarkers into routine preprocedural assessment may complement conventional echocardiographic evaluation and improve the identification of patients at increased risk of early post-procedural AF.

From a practical perspective, both PWDis and PTFV1 are inexpensive, universally available, and require only a standard 12-lead ECG. Identification of high-risk patients before ASD closure may justify closer telemetry surveillance, aggressive correction of reversible peri-procedural triggers, and consideration of prolonged ambulatory rhythm monitoring after discharge. Such individualized management may facilitate earlier AF detection and timely initiation of appropriate therapy.

Although early AF may be clinically relevant in the peri-procedural setting, it likely reflects a combination of pre-existing atrial substrate and transient triggers such as procedural inflammation, autonomic imbalance, and acute hemodynamic shifts. Therefore, our results do not necessarily translate to medium- or long-term arrhythmia burden.

Study Limitations

Some limitations of this study should be acknowledged. First, the retrospective design has limitations. Second, rhythm monitoring was performed continuously via telemetry during the first 24 hours after the procedure, while AF detection during the subsequent 24-hour period relied on bedside monitoring systems and symptom-triggered ECG recordings. Although this monitoring strategy reflects routine clinical practice in many institutions, it may have failed to detect short-term or asymptomatic AF episodes. Third, PWDis and PTFV1 measurements were obtained from digitized ECG recordings by manually defining the onset and end of the P wave. Although all measurements were performed at high magnification by two independent cardiologists blinded to clinical outcomes, manual ECG analysis may be subject to measurement variability. Finally, the relatively small number of AF events limited the complexity of multivariate modeling and may have increased the risk of model instability or overfitting. Therefore, the number of predictors included in the regression model was intentionally limited. Accordingly, the findings should be interpreted with caution and primarily considered hypothesis-generating. Furthermore, ROC analyses demonstrated only modest discriminatory performance, suggesting that these ECG indices alone are insufficient for clinical decision-making but may contribute as complementary markers within a broader risk assessment framework. Taken together, our findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and should be confirmed in larger prospective studies with extended rhythm follow-up.

The present findings also emphasize that ECG-derived atrial biomarkers should be interpreted as markers of the underlying atrial substrate rather than isolated predictors of arrhythmia. Although the predictive performance of PWDis and PTFV1 was modest, their widespread availability, low cost, and ease of measurement make them attractive adjunctive tools for identifying patients who may benefit from intensified rhythm surveillance after transcatheter ASD closure.

CONCLUSION

Baseline PWDis and PTFV1 independently predict early AF after percutaneous ASD closure. These readily obtainable ECG indices may enhance risk stratification and inform peri-procedural management in contemporary practice.

Ethics

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethics committee approval for the study was obtained from the Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee of İzmir Bakırçay University (decision number: 2105; date: 7 March 2025).
Informed Consent: Written informed consent was not obtained because of retrospective design.

Authorship Contributions

Surgical and Medical Practices: Y.D., S.S., O.Ş., Concept: A.A.B., Design: Y.D., O.Ş., Data Collection or Processing: Y.D., A.A.B., S.S., Analysis or Interpretation: O.Ş., Literature Search: A.A.B., Writing: A.A.B.
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Financial Disclosure: The authors declared that this study received no financial support.

References

1
Gatzoulis MA, Freeman MA, Siu SC, Webb GD, Harris L. Atrial arrhythmia after surgical closure of atrial septal defects in adults. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:839-46.
2
Berger F, Vogel M, Kramer A, et al. Incidence of atrial flutter/fibrillation in adults with atrial septal defect before and after surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:75-8.
3
Oliver JM, Gallego P, González A, Benito F, Mesa JM, Sobrino JA. Predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation in atrial septal defect with and without operative closure. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89:39-43.
4
Giardini A, Donti A, Sciarra F, Bronzetti G, Mariucci E, Picchio FM. Long-term incidence of atrial fibrillation and flutter after transcatheter atrial septal defect closure in adults. Int J Cardiol. 2009;134:47-51.
5
Spies C, Khandelwal A, Timmermanns I, Schräder R. Incidence of atrial fibrillation following transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects in adults. Am J Cardiol. 2008;102:902-6.
6
Abaci A, Unlu S, Alsancak Y, Kaya U, Sezenoz B. Short and long term complications of device closure of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale: meta-analysis of 28,142 patients from 203 studies. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013;82:1123-38.
7
Morton JB, Sanders P, Vohra JK, et al. Effect of chronic right atrial stretch on atrial electrical remodeling in patients with an atrial septal defect. Circulation. 2003;107:1775-82.
8
Fang F, Luo XX, Lin QS, et al. Characterization of mid-term atrial geometrical and electrical remodeling following device closure of atrial septal defects in adults. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:467-71.
9
Chubb H, Whitaker J, Williams SE, et al. Pathophysiology and management of arrhythmias associated with atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale. Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2014;3:168-72.
10
Goette A, Corradi D, Dobrev D, et al. Atrial cardiomyopathy revisited-evolution of a concept: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asian Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). Europace. 2024;26:euae204.
11
Baumgartner H, De Backer J, Babu-Narayan SV, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the management of adult congenital heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:563-645.
12
Johnson JN, Marquardt ML, Ackerman MJ, et al. Electrocardiographic changes and arrhythmias following percutaneous atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale device closure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011;78:254-61.
13
Dilaveris PE, Gialafos JE. P-wave dispersion: a novel predictor of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2001;6:159-65.
14
Aytemir K, Ozer N, Atalar E, et al. P wave dispersion on 12-lead electrocardiography in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:1109-12.
15
Ozer N, Aytemir K, Atalar E, et al. P wave dispersion in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000;23:1859-62.
16
Okutucu S, Aytemir K, Oto A. P-wave dispersion: What we know till now? JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;5:2048004016639443.
17
Magnani JW, Williamson MA, Ellinor PT, Monahan KM, Benjamin EJ. P wave indices: current status and future directions in epidemiology, clinical, and research applications. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2:72-9.
18
Chen LY, Ribeiro ALP, Platonov PG, et al. P wave parameters and indices: a critical appraisal of clinical utility, challenges, and future research-a consensus document endorsed by the International Society of Electrocardiology and the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2022;15:e010435.
19
Bethell HJ, Nixon PG. P wave of electrocardiogram in early ischaemic heart disease. Br Heart J. 1972;34:1170-5.
20
Wolder LD, Graff C, Baadsgaard KH, et al. Electrocardiographic P terminal force in lead V1, its components, and the association with stroke and atrial fibrillation or flutter. Heart Rhythm. 2023;20:354-62.
21
Eranti A, Aro AL, Kerola T, et al. Prevalence and prognostic significance of abnormal P terminal force in lead V1 of the ECG in the general population. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:1116-21.
22
Woo SB, Jang SI, Kim SH, et al. Transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defect in patients over 60 years old. Korean Circ J. 2013;43:110-4.
23
Wagdi P. Incidence and predictors of atrial fibrillation following transcatheter closure of interatrial septal communications using contemporary devices. Clin Res Cardiol. 2010;99:507-10.
24
Bronzetti G, D’Angelo C, Donti A, et al. Role of atrial fibrillation after transcatheter closure of patent foramen ovale in patients with or without cryptogenic stroke. Int J Cardiol. 2011;146:17-21.
25
Berger F, Vogel M, Kretschmar O, Dave H, Prêtre R, Dodge-Khatami A. Arrhythmias in patients with surgically treated atrial septal defects. Swiss Med Wkly. 2005;135:175-8.
26
Deaconu S, Deaconu A, Marascu G, et al. Arrhythmic risk and treatment after transcatheter atrial septal defect closure. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;14:33.
27
Doğduş M, Turan OE, Başkurt AA, et al. An effective novel index for predicting the recurrence of atrial fibrillation ablation: p wave duration-to-amplitude ratio. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2022;50:498-504.
28
Antoun I, Li X, Vali Z, et al. The value of P-wave parameters changes in predicting catheter ablation outcomes for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2025;30:e70047.
29
Masood S, Ashraf SMK, Malik MA, Wahab S. P-wave indices and left atrial mechanics as predictors of atrial cardiopathy in embolic stroke of undetermined source. Sci Rep. 2023;13:19965.
30
Intzes S, Zagoridis K, Symeonidou M, et al. P-wave duration and atrial fibrillation recurrence after catheter ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Europace. 2023;25:450-9.
31
Maezono A, Oishi E, Sasaki T, et al. Electrocardiographic P-wave indices and onset of atrial fibrillation and histological fibrosis in a general Japanese population: a prospective cohort analysis of the Hisayama Study. Eur Heart J Open. 2025;5:oeaf126.
32
Arslan GY, Söner S. P-wave terminal force in lead V1-Morris index after catheter ablation: a study in atrial fibrillation and typical atrial flutter patients. Eskisehir Med J. 2026;7:134-7.
33
Sudo Y, Morimoto T, Tsushima R, et al. P-wave terminal force in lead V1 and outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation. Am Heart J. 2023;141-150.
34
Wang Z, Wang B, Yang Y, Yang X, Che Y, Xia Y. P-wave terminal force in lead V1 is associated with recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and normal left atrial size. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024;11:1467585.
35
Tereshchenko LG. P-terminal force in lead V1: May the force be with you. Heart Rhythm. 2023;20:363-4.